What types of investment accounts do you have?
As recently-retired person, I have a pension for day-to-day stability (replacing previous salary, which did the same thing) and an aggressive-oriented collection of 401K, personal IRA, and regular investment accounts. The 401K is fund-based per plan allowance and suits the "hands-off" investment style, the personal IRA and regular investment accounts are a combination of funds and individual equity/bond selections that is mostly "hands-on".
How do you think this will impact your overall investment management preferences?
One feature of modern low-cost investing that I take advantage of is multiple brokerage accounts (mostly historic artifact, but having access to differing features is nice) and multiple accounts to create distinct "buckets" (this account focuses on equities, that account is for fixed income, etc) My management preference overall is "hands-on", driven by:
- AAII articles that demonstrate the challenge of professional management to consistently beat the market and it is easy to do worse. There is a lot to be said for accepting market returns with a "hands-on" choice of an index fund. It seems any low-cost fund will do.
- The professional management service that comes with the 401K program presents itself as "trust us, we're experts" but without documenting performance. Their recommendations seem pretty "textbook" and so, easy to essentially duplicate on one's own. This would be your "hands-on" risk/return management selection of equity fund vs bond fund. It seems any ratio from 1 to 1/2 puts you in the ballpark, after you have done the PRISM offensive/defensive worksheet.
- A big part of my management preference is in Funds, which are only reviewed occasionally. It is "hands-on" that I made the Fund selection, but "hands-off" that I make a point to review it only occasionally, letting time-in-market do its magic.
- I specifically set up buckets for my tactical attempts to "do something", limiting the hit that bad decisions can have, while testing my skill at being really "hands-on".
The other way to interpret "impact" is performance. With several decades of investment history (and a really timid start), I can find individual years where my portfolio did better and ones that did worse than the S&P 500. Over the long haul, I come out several percentage points lower than the S&P 500. Overall, I would have been better off with everything in a simple S&P 500 fund, but it is hard to wean off gambling on my clever ideas.
------------------------------
Hugh POLING
amateur radio station KC7HP
------------------------------