AAII Cleveland Ohio Chapter

communities_1.jpg
 View Only
  • 1.  Beating T-Bill returns

    Posted 21 days ago

    I have some "safe money" in T-Bills at 3.7%.  I would like to make more on these funds.  Investment guys say Bonds and I must accept more risk if I want higher returns.

    I am thinking about 75% in T-Bills and 25% in QQQI (paying 13.89% TTM right now)  That would increase my risk but move my returns to about 6%

     Am I missing something here?  Go ahead and "burst my bubble" 



    ------------------------------
    John R.
    ------------------------------


  • 2.  RE: Beating T-Bill returns

    Posted 20 days ago

    This is the answer from Claude.ai. It can make mistakes and non of this is personal advice, but I queried your qqqi choice.

    QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF)

    Pros

    • Section 1256 tax treatment on its index options activity - gains/losses get the 60/40 long-term/short-term blend. Materially better after-tax yield than ordinary-income covered call ETFs.
    • High distribution rate (typically running ~14%+ annualized), paid monthly - useful for income smoothing in retirement cash flow planning.
    • Nasdaq-100 underlying exposure tethered to large-cap growth/tech, so you're not giving up all upside the way some yield-maxxing products do.
    • Active management of the call overlay - NEOS adjusts strikes and laddering rather than running a static at-the-money program, which has historically helped capture more upside than rigid covered call ETFs.
    • ROC-heavy distributions in many months, which defers taxes (reduces basis rather than triggering current income).

    Cons

    • Capped upside in strong Nasdaq rallies - the call overlay will always lag QQQ in melt-up environments. Worth comparing 1Y total return vs. QQQ 
    • Relatively short track record - launched January 2024, so you don't have a full cycle including a sustained bear market to stress-test the strategy.
    • NAV erosion risk if distributions outpace total return over time. Monitoring NAV trend quarterly is the right discipline.
    • Concentration risk - Nasdaq-100 is top-heavy in the Mag 7. 
    • Expense ratio ~0.68% - not egregious for an active options-overlay ETF, but higher than passive equivalents.
    • Distribution variability - monthly payouts fluctuate with volatility regimes. In low-VIX environments, premium income compresses and distributions can dip.
    • If you ever want to diversify the call-write exposure away from Nasdaq concentration, SPYI (S&P 500 version, same NEOS family, same 1256 treatment) is the natural complement.


    ------------------------------
    JOHN PINKOWSKI
    ------------------------------