It has worked as advertised. There is bull market friction, because you get whipsawed out of the market occasionally, and end up buying back in higher than your exit point. However, you make it back during bear markets, case in point is 2022, I am down 10% for the entire year, which is better than the 60/40. The buy and hold part of my portfolio contributed significantly to the drawdown.
The trade discipline is trade once a month only, at the end of month.The Tactical Asset Allocation (TAA) part of my portfolio (65%) consists of:
Bold Asset Allocation (Aggressive)Generalized Protective MomentumPaul Novell's SPY-COMPGary Antonacci's Global Equities Momentum (GEM)I also have buy and hold (35%) precious metals, gold miners (painful drawdown) I-Bonds, Treasury Bills, Notes, and Bonds, and an Oil & Gas Limited Partnership. I sold Bitcoin for a handsome profit, but not before it drew down from $49k to $22.5k in 2022.
If we look at the backtest of just the TAA portion, with weights 40% 40% 10% 10% to each strategy, we get the following results (1/1/73 - 12/30/22):
CAGR 15.3%, Sharpe ratio 1.21, Max Drawdown -8.5%, Longest Drawdown 16 months, Ulcer Performance Index (UPI) 5.11
The Benchmark 60/40:
CAGR 9.1%, Sharpe ratio 0.46, Max Drawdown -29.5%, Longest Drawdown 40 months, Ulcer Performance Index (UPI) 0.75
My TAA strategies are tax-inefficient, high turnover. I only use them in my IRAs.
I source my signals and do my backtests at Allocate Smartly. The cost is minimal compared to my portfolio size. The Allocate Smartly results above are net of estimated expenses and trading friction.
------------------------------
PETER WANG
------------------------------