Thanks, Peter, for providing this information to consider.
I overlooked the awkward timing of a post on April Fool's Day and took your suggestion at face value. I read your link provided and then followed other links to additional materials on this topic.
I concluded that a dynamic momentum strategy -- trading on patterns in variations detected in evolving trends - is way above my financial and emotional skill sets.
I see this opportunity as trading one set of "known, familiar" risks for another set of "known unknown, unfamiliar" risks as Bob McNamara would say.
I did enjoy reading the educational materials you steered me to. Thank you for taking time to help us improve our skill sets.
However, I have enough cookies on "Cookie Tray" now just managing ...
a buy-and-hold strategy using
· low-ER (lowers costs), high-AUM (higher liquidity) ETFs to
· allocate beaten growth and value equities,
· aligned and rebalanced by broad sector "momentum" to
· historical changes in the phases of the larger business cycle as it
· transmogrified by the residual impacts Fed monetary policy and
· the capricious vicissitudes of Executive Branch fiscal/debt policy.
That "tragic comedy" entertains me enough.
I am more than comfortable with the positive imbalances in my current return/risk profile (as described above). The return factor continues to scale with an acceptable slope and the risk factor continues to scale at a much lower slope, both within the range of variation my risk profile dictates.
I barely have enough time to keep my golf score in line with my age. That is a return/risk problem that challenges me greatly.
Regards.
I
------------------------------
BARRY JOHNSON
------------------------------